New Delhi, May 1 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Wednesday passed an interim order restraining the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and other authorities from shifting the remaining deer from AN Jha Deer Park in Delhi’s Hauz Khas area to forest zones in Rajasthan and other states.
A bench comprising justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan issued the interim direction on a petition filed by the New Delhi Nature Society.
The petition stated that about 600 deer in the park were at risk of being relocated without proper habitat assessments, veterinary checks, or safeguards for vulnerable groups such as pregnant deer and fawns.
It also contended that three batches of deer had already been relocated to predator-dense sanctuaries in Rajasthan, allegedly in violation of wildlife protection laws.
The court order stated, "For the time being, we restrain the respondents from shifting the existing deer out of the Deer Park at Hauz Khas, New Delhi. We also make it clear that the deer shall be properly looked after by the authorities."
The petition challenged the DDA’s reliance on the Central Zoo Authority’s (CZA) decision to withdraw the park’s recognition as a ‘mini-zoo’ and argued that the withdrawal was being treated as a basis to dismantle the park without following the due process under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.
It raised objections to the use of the “Boma method” for capturing and transporting the deer, stating it lacked provisions to separate antlered males, pregnant or nursing females, juveniles, or sick animals.
The petition also invoked the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, claiming that relocating semi-urban, captive deer to predator zones amounted to cruelty, particularly under Section 11, which prohibits keeping any animal in a way that makes it an object of prey.
The petitioner cited an official communication from the Chief Wildlife Warden of Rajasthan requesting 550 deer from Delhi to enhance the prey base for carnivores in Sariska and Kumbhalgarh.
It also pointed to internal communications allegedly indicating that the DDA considered relocating the deer even before obtaining requisite approvals.
The petitioner raised concerns that the relocation plan could lead to the repurposing or dismantling of the deer park, which it described as ecologically significant.
The petition noted that the matter was earlier before the Delhi High Court, which in 2023 had stayed the relocation and suggested retaining at least 50 deer in Hauz Khas.
However, the High Court closed the case in July 2024 after the DDA submitted that 24 deer would remain at the site and the rest would be shifted after obtaining necessary permissions.
According to the petitioner, that order was passed without an opportunity to respond to the DDA’s affidavit, and it alleged that the society’s then-counsel accepted the affidavit without instructions.
A plea to recall the July 2024 order was dismissed in January 2025, leading to the present appeal before the Supreme Court.
The petition was filed through Advocate Rukhsana Choudhury and drawn by advocate Amita Singh.
UNI SNG PRS