New Delhi, May 19 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Monday consolidated all cases concerning the Boxing Federation of India (BFI) elections before the Delhi High Court, following consent from all parties involved.
A bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice N Kotiswar Singh passed the order while hearing petitions filed by former Union Sports Minister Anurag Thakur and the Himachal Pradesh Boxing Association (HPBA), challenging the Himachal Pradesh High Court’s interim orders relating to the BFI election process.
“We have discussed the matter in open court. Parties agree that Delhi High Court can be the appropriate forum to agitate all issues.
We dispose of cases pending before Himachal Pradesh High Court with liberty to the writ petitioners before the High Court to file either a fresh writ before Delhi High Court or join the pending proceedings. Respondents undertake not to raise issue of territorial jurisdiction,” the court ordered.
The Supreme Court also directed that a stay passed by the Division Bench of the Himachal Pradesh High Court effectively halting the election process would remain in force for six weeks.
The parties were permitted to seek continuation or modification of the stay before the Delhi High Court during this period.
The consolidation aims to prevent multiplicity of litigation and conflicting judicial decisions. “Ideally, we should have viewpoint of one High Court,” Justice Surya Kant observed.
The petitions arose from a dispute over the disqualification of Anurag Thakur from participating in the BFI elections.
Thakur, an executive member of HPBA, was nominated by the association to contest the March 28 elections. However, his nomination was rejected without notice or hearing, allegedly at the behest of former BFI President Ajay Singh.
The BFI had issued a notification on March 7, adding fresh eligibility criteria for nominations. This notification was challenged as being in violation of the Federation’s Memorandum of Association and the National Sports Development Code of India, 2011. It was also argued that the notification was issued after the expiry of Ajay Singh’s tenure as BFI president.
Initially, a single judge of the Himachal Pradesh High Court had stayed Thakur’s disqualification and directed an extension of the nomination deadline. This was overturned by a Division Bench, prompting the current proceedings before the Supreme Court.
As per the Supreme Court’s direction, the legal battle over the BFI elections, particularly concerning Anurag Thakur's disqualification, will now be adjudicated solely by the Delhi High Court.
UNI SNG PRS