Melbourne, June 15 (UNI) Josh Hazlewood's decision to prioritise the Indian Premier League (IPL) over Australia's Test preparations has come under the scanner following the team's defeat in the World Test Championship final at Lord’s.

The seasoned pacer, who has battled recurring injuries in recent years, chose to participate in the delayed IPL season instead of joining early preparations for the marquee Test event. The move has triggered debate among former players and fans alike, many questioning the commitment of senior players to the red-ball format.

"Hazlewood's fitness has been a concern for some time, and to then opt for the IPL before a major Test final doesn’t send the right message," said Mitchell Johnson, a former Test cricketer, adding that Australia must reassess its approach to player workload and priorities, especially with crucial tours like the West Indies series and Ashes looming.

While acknowledging the commercial appeal of the IPL, critics argue that national duty must take precedence, particularly for a bowler like Hazlewood who has struggled to maintain continuity in the Test arena. His performance in the WTC final lacked the sharpness usually associated with him, further fuelling doubts over his match readiness.

Hazlewood's choice has also reopened the broader conversation about balancing franchise cricket with international commitments. As one of the world's premier fast bowlers, his presence is vital to Australia’s Test strategy, but only if managed carefully.

With calls growing louder for generational transition, selectors may soon need to make tough decisions. Fringe players like Scott Boland, known for their discipline and hunger, are knocking on the door, and the selectors will have to weigh form and fitness over legacy and seniority.

As Cricket Australia charts the course forward, Hazlewood's IPL stint will likely remain a cautionary case in balancing personal opportunities with national expectations.

UNI BDN GNK